Sep 24, 2018

No Maintenance Strategy


Edited: Sep 28, 2018

​No maintenance strategy?


Not having a maintenance strategy is the simplest “strategy” to have for asset maintenance. The absence of a strategy eliminates the need to plan ahead for maintenance.

Unplanned, reactive maintenance is the most likely type of maintenance that will occur. Despite the fact that no strategy exists, most types of maintenance tasks are still possible.  For example:

  • Unplanned, reactive maintenance will occur any time the asset breaks down.

  • Preventative maintenance may occur when the operator (or someone else) decides to do it. This may include lubrication or cleaning. However, this maintenance is unstructured and does not occur according to a formalized schedule or due to a trigger.

  • Predictive monitoring may also occur. For example, a bathroom sink may be subject to condition monitoring every time it is used. The user may notice a decrease in flow rate, and initiate preventive repairs for the sink.


Suitable Applications

A “no maintenance strategy” may be suitable for homes and home workshops. Owned equipment may never have had any planning for maintenance strategy. When the equipment is non-critical and does not pose any safety risk, this strategy may be ideal.


Unsuitable Applications

A “no maintenance strategy” approach is unsuitable in most other situations. The risk of equipment unavailability, or safety issues should prompt some level of thought about a maintenance strategy.

Triggers used for “no maintenance strategy” maintenance

Many triggers can be used for this type of “no maintenance strategy” maintenance. These, however, are all characterized by an unstructured and unplanned approach.


  • Breakdown trigger: Breakdown is the most likely trigger for maintenance. If the asset is required and not working, then maintenance will be required.

  • Time trigger: Time may also be used as a trigger. “I haven’t lubricated the machine for a long time” could be a trigger for maintenance.

  • Event trigger: An event could be used. A news report of a fire being caused by a similar asset may trigger a maintenance inspection.

  • Usage trigger: A usage trigger may initiate work. A counter ticking over to a significant milestone (say 100 hours) may initiate maintenance by the user if they want to. Importantly, this would not be pre-planned.

  • Condition trigger: Condition may also be used. The example of the bathroom sink beginning to run slowly is an example of this trigger.

Commenting is off for this post.
New Posts
  • What is risk-based maintenance? Definition Risk-based maintenance (RBM) prioritizes maintenance resources toward assets that carry the most risk if they were to fail. It is a methodology for determining the most economical use of maintenance resources. This is done so that the maintenance effort across a facility is optimized to minimize any risk of a failure. A risk-based maintenance strategy is based on two main phases: Risk assessment Maintenance planning based on the risk The maintenance type and frequency are prioritized based on the risk of failure. Assets that have a greater risk and consequence of failure are maintained and monitored more frequently. Assets that carry a lower risk are subjected to less stringent maintenance programs. Implementing a risk-based maintenance process means that the total risk of failure is minimized across the facility in the most economical way. ​ The monitoring and maintenance programs for high risk assets are typically condition-based maintenance programs. Suitable applications Risk-based maintenance is a suitable strategy for any maintenance plan. As a methodology, it provides a systematic approach to determine the most appropriate asset maintenance plans. Upon implementation of these maintenance plans, the risk of asset failure will be low. Risk-based Maintenance Framework The risk-based maintenance framework is applied to each system in a facility. A system, for example, may be a high-pressure vessel. That system will have neighbouring systems that pass fluid to and from the vessel. The likely failure modes of the system are first determined. Then, a typical risk-based maintenance framework is applied to each risk. The framework is shown in the diagram. Collect Data For each identified risk, data needs to be collected. This includes information about the risk, its general consequences and the general methods used to mitigate and predict the risk. Risk Evaluation At the risk evaluation stage, both the probability of the risk and the consequence of the risk are quantified in the context of the facility under consideration. Rank Risks With the risk evaluation complete, the probability and consequence are combined to determine the total risk. This total risk is ranked against pre-determined levels of risk. As a result, the risk is either acceptable or unacceptable. Create an Inspection Plan If the risk is unacceptable, a plan to inspect the system using a condition monitoring approach is determined. Or, if it is more cost appropriate, and technically feasible a  preventative maintenance  program might be selected. Propose Mitigation Measures At this stage the proposal for mitigating the risk, using the condition monitoring and maintenance approach, is prepared. Re-assessment Finally, the proposal is evaluated against other factors – such as legal and regulatory requirements. If the proposal’s needs are not met, then the process starts again. Otherwise, the maintenance proposal is put into place. How to assess the risk Assessing the risk of failure is one of the most important aspects of risk based maintenance. The more accurately this is done, the better the risk based maintenance outcomes will be. ​ There is no one standard method for assessing risk. Qualitative, semi-quantitative and quantitative approaches are used to determine the possible risks that exist. To estimate the likelihood of these risks, the methods that are used include deterministic, and probabilistic approaches. 62 different approaches to assessing risk are described in Tixier (2002) . The most appropriate approach will depend on the data that is available to evaluate each risk. Visit our Risk Based Strategy Development Consulting page for more information on risk management services we offer Further reading:​ Arunraj, N.S. & Maiti, J., 2007.  Risk-based maintenance—Techniques and applications . Journal of Hazardous Materials, 142(3), pp.653–661. Khan, F.I. & Haddara, M.M., 2003.  Risk-based maintenance (RBM): a quantitative approach for maintenance/inspection scheduling and planning . Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 16(6), pp.561–573. Sakai, S., 2010.  Risk-Based Maintenance . JR East Technical Review, 17, pp.1–4. Tixier, J. et al., 2002.  Review of 62 risk analysis methodologies of industrial plants . Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 15(4), pp.291–303.
  • What is reliability centered maintenance? Definition Reliability centered maintenance (RCM) is a corporate-level maintenance strategy that is implemented to optimize the maintenance program of a company or facility. The final result of an RCM program is the implementation of a specific maintenance strategy on each of the assets of the facility. The  maintenance strategies  are optimized so that the productivity of the plant is maintained using cost-effective maintenance techniques. There are four principles that are critical for an reliability centered maintenance program: The primary objective is to preserve system function Identify failure modes that can affect the system function Prioritize the failure modes Select applicable and effective tasks to control the failure modes 7 questions that need to be asked for RCM An effective reliability centered maintenance implementation examines the facility as a series of functional systems, each of which has inputs and outputs contributing to the success of the facility. It is the reliability, rather than the functionality, of these systems that are considered. The SAE JA1011 has a set of minimum criteria before a maintenance strategy can be called RCM (Gulati). The seven questions that need to be asked for each asset are: What are the functions and desired performance standards of each asset? How can each asset fail to fulfill its functions? What are the failure modes for each functional failure? What causes each of the failure modes? What are the consequences of each failure? What can and/or should be done to predict or prevent each failure? What should be done if a suitable proactive task cannot be determined? Want to learn more about key performance indicators (KPIs) for maintenance excellence? Read our "Advanced CMMS Metrics" eBook to find out how you can measure them with your CMMS software. > Go To Downloads Page Hit your targets with RCM Reliability-centered maintenance identifies the functions of the company that are most critical and then seeks to optimize their maintenance strategies to minimize system failures to ultimately increase equipment reliability and availability. The most critical assets are those that are likely to fail often or have large consequences of failure. With this maintenance strategy, possible failure modes and their consequences are identified; all while the function of the equipment is considered. Cost-effective maintenance techniques that minimize the possibility of failure can then be determined. The most effective techniques are then adopted to improve the reliability of the facility as a whole. Advantages Implementing RCM increases equipment availability, and reduces maintenance and resource costs. Jardine and Tsang give an example of a utility company who reduced maintenance costs by up to 40% Disadvantages RCM does not readily consider the total cost of owning and maintaining an asset. Additional costs of ownership, like those considered in evidence-based maintenance, are not considered, and are therefore not factored into the maintenance considerations. The 7 steps for implementing reliability centered maintenance There are several different methods for implementing reliability centered maintenance that are recommended, summarized in the following 7 steps. Step 1: Selection of equipment for RCM analysis The first step is to select the piece of equipment for reliability centered maintenance analysis. The equipment selected should be critical, in terms of its effect on operations, its previous costs of repair and previous costs of  preventative maintenance . Step 2: Define the boundaries and function of the systems that contain the selected equipment ​ The equipment belongs to a system that performs a crucial function. The system can be large or small, but the function of the system, and its inputs and outputs, should be known. For example, the function of a conveyor belt system is to transport goods. Its inputs are the goods and mechanical energy powering the belt, while its outputs are the goods at the other end. In this case, the electric motor supplying the mechanical energy would be considered as part of a different system. Step 3: Define the ways that the system can fail (failure modes) ​ In step 3 the objective is to list all of the ways that the function of the system can fail. For example, the conveyor belt may fail by being unable to transport the goods from one end to the other, or perhaps it does not transport the goods quickly enough. Step 4: Identify the root causes of the failure modes With the help of operators, experienced technicians, RCM experts and equipment experts, the root causes of each of the failure modes can be identified. Root causes for failure of the conveyor could include a lack of lubrication on the rollers, a failure of a bearing, or a loosened belt. Step 5: Assess the effects of failure In this step the effects of each failure mode are considered. Equipment failures may affect safety, operations and other equipment. Criticality of each of these failure modes can also be considered. There are various recommended techniques that are used to give this step a systematic approach. These include: Failure, mode and effects analysis (FMEA) Failure, mode, effect and criticality analysis Hazard and operability studies (HAZOPS) Fault tree analysis (FTA) Risk-based inspection (RBI) The most important failure modes will be determined at the conclusion of this systematic analysis. Ask yourself questions such as “Does this failure mode have safety implications?”, and “Does this failure mode result in a full or partial outage of operations?”. Your answer is the most important failure modes that should be prioritized for further analysis. Importantly, the failure modes that are retained include only those that have a real probability of occurring under realistic operating conditions. Step 6: Select a maintenance tactic for each failure mode At this step, the most appropriate maintenance tactic for each failure mode is determined. The maintenance tactic that is selected must be technically and economically feasible. Condition-based maintenance is selected when it is technically and economically feasible to detect the onset of the failure mode. Time or usage-based  preventative maintenance  is selected when it is technically and economically feasible to reduce the risk of failure using this method. For failure modes that do not have satisfactory condition based maintenance or  preventative maintenance  options, then a redesign of the system to eliminate or modify the failure mode should be considered. Failure modes that were not identified as being critical in Step 6 may, at this stage, be identified as good candidates for a  run-to-failure maintenance schedule. Step 7: Implement and then regularly review the maintenance tactic selected ​ Importantly, the RCM methodology will only be useful if its maintenance recommendations are put into practice. When that has been done, it is important that the recommendations are constantly reviewed and renewed as additional information is found. Speak to us if you need help setting up a RCM program at your operation
  • What is reactive maintenance? Reactive maintenance (also known as “breakdown maintenance”) are repairs that are done when equipment has already broken down. Reactive maintenance focuses on restoring the equipment to its normal operating condition. The broken-down equipment is returned to working within service specifications by replacing or repairing faulty parts and components. Emergency repairs cost 3 to 9 times more than planned repairs, so maintenance plans that rely on on reactive maintenance are generally the most expensive. Breakdown maintenance is so expensive because shutdowns happen during production runs (instead of pre-scheduled maintenance shutdowns during downtimes); because expedited shipping for spare parts costs much more than regular shipping; and because maintenance staff is often forced to work overtime to repair machinery. Advantages of Reactive Maintenance​ Lower initial costs – As your systems are new, they require little maintenance so you save on parts and emergency labour. Requires fewer staff – Complex repairs tend to be outsourced reducing the need for internal staff. No planning needed – Technicians repair equipment when it fails. As fails are unpredictable, no time is spent planning the repairs. Disadvantages of Reactive Maintenance Due to the unpredictable nature of reactive maintenance, there are a number of disadvantages: Difficult to control budgets – As equipment failures can be unpredictable, labour and spare parts may not be readily available so organizations may end up paying a premium for emergency parts shipping, travel time and out of hours support. Shorter life expectancy of assets – Reactive maintenance does not keep the systems running in optimal “as new” condition. Over time, systems that have been maintained deteriorate faster so don’t maximize their initial capital cost investment. Safety issues – When work is scheduled, technicians have time to review the standard procedures and safety requirements to complete the job correctly. Technicians tend to take more risks when maintenance work is reactive as they are under pressure to get systems running without delay. Time consuming – Reactive repairs tend to take longer due to a number of factors including time to diagnose, travel time, time to pull parts from stores or emergency order, time to pull correct manuals and schematics etc. Sporadic equipment downtime – planned maintenance can be written into the production schedule whereas unplanned repairs can happen anytime. Also, there is the uncertainty around the length of delay due to the repair. Inefficient use of resources – Technicians spend time running around looking for the correct manuals and schematics, ordering the right parts etc trying to diagnose and fix the issue. Interferes with planned work – Emergency repairs are usually prioritized at the expense of planned work. Planned work may be pushed or cancelled completely. Collateral Damage – A minor issue could quickly into a major system repair. If your engine is low on oil, it could result in a completely seized engine. I personally had a water leak that spilt onto an electronics cabinet, causing tens of thousands of dollars in damaged electronic boards. Indirect costs – Unplanned downtime can lead to late orders if equipment cannot be returned to production in time. This can damage reputations and impact revenues. Repeat issues – Reactive maintenance does the bare minimum to get the system up and running again. If not repaired correctly, the issue could reoccur and cause more downtime. Higher energy costs – If you don’t service your car, it burns more fuel! When equipment is not properly maintained, it uses more energy. Doing simple things like greasing moving parts or changing filters can reduce energy consumption by 15%. When Should Reactive Maintenance Be Used? Reactive maintenance should only be performed on components that are inexpensive, easy to replace, where the failure does not cause collateral damage in the system or where the cost of reactive maintenance is not greater than preventative maintenance. Reactive maintenance is also ideal for business that cannot plan work due to the nature of the industry. An example would be satellite communications. It is too costly to send technicians into space to perform regular preventive maintenance. Reactive maintenance is present in all maintenance strategies because equipment failure can’t be perfectly predicted. Two industry “rules of thumb” say that you should aim for only 20% of your maintenance time to be devoted to reactive maintenance, and that in reality teams spend about 45% of their time doing reactive maintenance. A 2008 maintenance study out of the University of Tennessee paints a rosier picture: out of 217 North American companies, the average company spent only 34% of its maintenance time doing reactive maintenance.

© 2018 by EAMS Global, all rights reserved

  • Facebook Social Icon